public inbox for kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] pstore: Adjustments for some function implementations
@ 2017-08-16 19:20 SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Kees Cook, Tony Luck,
	kernel-janitors; +Cc: LKML

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:06:54 +0200

Three update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (3):
  Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation
  Improve a size determination in three functions
  Adjust two checks for null pointers

 fs/pstore/ram.c      | 11 +++--------
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 21 +++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation
  2017-08-16 19:20 [PATCH 0/3] pstore: Adjustments for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:21 ` SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
  2017-08-16 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Kees Cook, Tony Luck,
	kernel-janitors; +Cc: LKML

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:30:44 +0200

Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 fs/pstore/ram.c      |  6 +-----
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 15 ++++-----------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
index 7125b398d312..42d27e5fac9f 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
@@ -719,7 +719,6 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (dev_of_node(dev) && !pdata) {
 		pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!pdata) {
-			pr_err("cannot allocate platform data buffer\n");
 			err = -ENOMEM;
 			goto fail_out;
 		}
@@ -814,7 +813,6 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	cxt->pstore.bufsize = max(cxt->record_size, cxt->pstore.bufsize);
 	cxt->pstore.buf = kmalloc(cxt->pstore.bufsize, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!cxt->pstore.buf) {
-		pr_err("cannot allocate pstore buffer\n");
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto fail_clear;
 	}
@@ -904,10 +902,8 @@ static void ramoops_register_dummy(void)
 	pr_info("using module parameters\n");
 
 	dummy_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dummy_data), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!dummy_data) {
-		pr_info("could not allocate pdata\n");
+	if (!dummy_data)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	dummy_data->mem_size = mem_size;
 	dummy_data->mem_address = mem_address;
diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
index e11672aa4575..fafa8af1289c 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
@@ -292,10 +292,8 @@ void persistent_ram_save_old(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz)
 	if (!prz->old_log) {
 		persistent_ram_ecc_old(prz);
 		prz->old_log = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	}
-	if (!prz->old_log) {
-		pr_err("failed to allocate buffer\n");
-		return;
+		if (!prz->old_log)
+			return;
 	}
 
 	prz->old_log_size = size;
@@ -411,8 +409,5 @@ static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
-	if (!pages) {
-		pr_err("%s: Failed to allocate array for %u pages\n",
-		       __func__, page_count);
+	if (!pages)
 		return NULL;
-	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
 		phys_addr_t addr = page_start + i * PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -529,7 +524,5 @@ struct persistent_ram_zone *persistent_ram_new(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
-	if (!prz) {
-		pr_err("failed to allocate persistent ram zone\n");
+	if (!prz)
 		goto err;
-	}
 
 	/* Initialize general buffer state. */
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&prz->buffer_lock);
-- 
2.14.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions
  2017-08-16 19:20 [PATCH 0/3] pstore: Adjustments for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:22 ` SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:33   ` Kees Cook
  2017-08-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Kees Cook, Tony Luck,
	kernel-janitors; +Cc: LKML

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:50:15 +0200

Replace the specification of data types by pointer dereferences
as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 fs/pstore/ram.c      | 3 +--
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
index 42d27e5fac9f..0ef95c384bed 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
 			 */
 			struct persistent_ram_zone *tmp_prz, *prz_next;
 
-			tmp_prz = kzalloc(sizeof(struct persistent_ram_zone),
-					  GFP_KERNEL);
+			tmp_prz = kzalloc(sizeof(*tmp_prz), GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!tmp_prz)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			free_prz = true;
diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
index fafa8af1289c..5d9f7280d757 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
 	else
 		prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL);
 
-	pages = kmalloc_array(page_count, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
+	pages = kmalloc_array(page_count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pages)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ struct persistent_ram_zone *persistent_ram_new(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
 	struct persistent_ram_zone *prz;
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
-	prz = kzalloc(sizeof(struct persistent_ram_zone), GFP_KERNEL);
+	prz = kzalloc(sizeof(*prz), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!prz)
 		goto err;
 
-- 
2.14.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers
  2017-08-16 19:20 [PATCH 0/3] pstore: Adjustments for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:23 ` SF Markus Elfring
  2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Kees Cook, Tony Luck,
	kernel-janitors; +Cc: LKML

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:00:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The script “checkpatch.pl” pointed information out like the following.

Comparison to NULL could be written !…

Thus fix affected source code places.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 fs/pstore/ram.c      | 2 +-
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
index 0ef95c384bed..38b81868f7f9 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
 	record->ecc_notice_size = persistent_ram_ecc_string(prz, NULL, 0);
 
 	record->buf = kmalloc(size + record->ecc_notice_size + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (record->buf = NULL) {
+	if (!record->buf) {
 		size = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
 	}
diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
index 5d9f7280d757..e37b2d0cb9f4 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int persistent_ram_init_ecc(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
 	 */
 	prz->rs_decoder = init_rs(prz->ecc_info.symsize, prz->ecc_info.poly,
 				  0, 1, prz->ecc_info.ecc_size);
-	if (prz->rs_decoder = NULL) {
+	if (!prz->rs_decoder) {
 		pr_info("init_rs failed\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.14.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation
  2017-08-16 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
  2017-08-16 19:58     ` SF Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-08-16 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SF Markus Elfring
  Cc: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, kernel-janitors, LKML

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:21 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:30:44 +0200
>
> Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

I'm not interested in removing these since they provide additional
details about which specific allocation failed.

> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

For all these kinds of patches please include details on which
coccinelle script did the detection...

-Kees

>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c      |  6 +-----
>  fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 15 ++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 7125b398d312..42d27e5fac9f 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -719,7 +719,6 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (dev_of_node(dev) && !pdata) {
>                 pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (!pdata) {
> -                       pr_err("cannot allocate platform data buffer\n");
>                         err = -ENOMEM;
>                         goto fail_out;
>                 }
> @@ -814,7 +813,6 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         cxt->pstore.bufsize = max(cxt->record_size, cxt->pstore.bufsize);
>         cxt->pstore.buf = kmalloc(cxt->pstore.bufsize, GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!cxt->pstore.buf) {
> -               pr_err("cannot allocate pstore buffer\n");
>                 err = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto fail_clear;
>         }
> @@ -904,10 +902,8 @@ static void ramoops_register_dummy(void)
>         pr_info("using module parameters\n");
>
>         dummy_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dummy_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!dummy_data) {
> -               pr_info("could not allocate pdata\n");
> +       if (!dummy_data)
>                 return;
> -       }
>
>         dummy_data->mem_size = mem_size;
>         dummy_data->mem_address = mem_address;
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> index e11672aa4575..fafa8af1289c 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> @@ -292,10 +292,8 @@ void persistent_ram_save_old(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz)
>         if (!prz->old_log) {
>                 persistent_ram_ecc_old(prz);
>                 prz->old_log = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -       }
> -       if (!prz->old_log) {
> -               pr_err("failed to allocate buffer\n");
> -               return;
> +               if (!prz->old_log)
> +                       return;
>         }
>
>         prz->old_log_size = size;
> @@ -411,8 +409,5 @@ static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
> -       if (!pages) {
> -               pr_err("%s: Failed to allocate array for %u pages\n",
> -                      __func__, page_count);
> +       if (!pages)
>                 return NULL;
> -       }
>
>         for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
>                 phys_addr_t addr = page_start + i * PAGE_SIZE;
> @@ -529,7 +524,5 @@ struct persistent_ram_zone *persistent_ram_new(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
> -       if (!prz) {
> -               pr_err("failed to allocate persistent ram zone\n");
> +       if (!prz)
>                 goto err;
> -       }
>
>         /* Initialize general buffer state. */
>         raw_spin_lock_init(&prz->buffer_lock);
> --
> 2.14.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers
  2017-08-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-08-16 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SF Markus Elfring
  Cc: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, kernel-janitors, LKML

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:23 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:00:16 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> The script “checkpatch.pl” pointed information out like the following.
>
> Comparison to NULL could be written !…
>
> Thus fix affected source code places.

I think these are find to do when changing other code, but as
stand-alone, I'm not interested in taking them, sorry!

-Kees

>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c      | 2 +-
>  fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 0ef95c384bed..38b81868f7f9 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
>         record->ecc_notice_size = persistent_ram_ecc_string(prz, NULL, 0);
>
>         record->buf = kmalloc(size + record->ecc_notice_size + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (record->buf == NULL) {
> +       if (!record->buf) {
>                 size = -ENOMEM;
>                 goto out;
>         }
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> index 5d9f7280d757..e37b2d0cb9f4 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int persistent_ram_init_ecc(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
>          */
>         prz->rs_decoder = init_rs(prz->ecc_info.symsize, prz->ecc_info.poly,
>                                   0, 1, prz->ecc_info.ecc_size);
> -       if (prz->rs_decoder == NULL) {
> +       if (!prz->rs_decoder) {
>                 pr_info("init_rs failed\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
> --
> 2.14.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions
  2017-08-16 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions SF Markus Elfring
@ 2017-08-16 19:33   ` Kees Cook
  2017-08-16 20:03     ` SF Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-08-16 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SF Markus Elfring
  Cc: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, kernel-janitors, LKML

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:22 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:50:15 +0200
>
> Replace the specification of data types by pointer dereferences
> as the parameter for the operator "sizeof" to make the corresponding size
> determination a bit safer according to the Linux coding style convention.

Agreed; this is a robustness change in that changes to the variable
structure will be correctly flowed through to the allocations.

>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Which script detected this?

-Kees

>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c      | 3 +--
>  fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 42d27e5fac9f..0ef95c384bed 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
>                          */
>                         struct persistent_ram_zone *tmp_prz, *prz_next;
>
> -                       tmp_prz = kzalloc(sizeof(struct persistent_ram_zone),
> -                                         GFP_KERNEL);
> +                       tmp_prz = kzalloc(sizeof(*tmp_prz), GFP_KERNEL);
>                         if (!tmp_prz)
>                                 return -ENOMEM;
>                         free_prz = true;
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> index fafa8af1289c..5d9f7280d757 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void *persistent_ram_vmap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
>         else
>                 prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL);
>
> -       pages = kmalloc_array(page_count, sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       pages = kmalloc_array(page_count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!pages)
>                 return NULL;
>
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ struct persistent_ram_zone *persistent_ram_new(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
>         struct persistent_ram_zone *prz;
>         int ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> -       prz = kzalloc(sizeof(struct persistent_ram_zone), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       prz = kzalloc(sizeof(*prz), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!prz)
>                 goto err;
>
> --
> 2.14.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation
  2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
@ 2017-08-16 19:58     ` SF Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, kernel-janitors, LKML

> I'm not interested in removing these since they provide additional
> details about which specific allocation failed.

Do you find the default allocation failure report insufficient?

Regards,
Markus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions
  2017-08-16 19:33   ` Kees Cook
@ 2017-08-16 20:03     ` SF Markus Elfring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2017-08-16 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kees Cook; +Cc: Anton Vorontsov, Colin Cross, Tony Luck, kernel-janitors, LKML

> Which script detected this?

* checkpatch.pl

* The following approach for the semantic patch language.

@replacement@
identifier action, var, work;
statement s1, s2;
statement list sl;
type T, X;
@@
 T work(...)
 {
 ... when any
 X* var;
 ... when any
 var = action(...,
              sizeof(
-                    X
+                    *var
                    ),
              ...
             )
 ... when any
 }


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-16 20:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-16 19:20 [PATCH 0/3] pstore: Adjustments for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] pstore: Delete six error messages for a failed memory allocation SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook
2017-08-16 19:58     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] pstore: Improve a size determination in three functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:33   ` Kees Cook
2017-08-16 20:03     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] pstore: Adjust two checks for null pointers SF Markus Elfring
2017-08-16 19:32   ` Kees Cook

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox