From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 10:40:38 +0000 Subject: Re: s390/debug: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Message-Id: <2e09585e-1ffd-4301-13a5-2792da0078b2@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <20160905123103.2c587d60@mschwide> In-Reply-To: <20160905123103.2c587d60@mschwide> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Joe Perches , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini > While I agree that the old code in arch/s390/kernel/debug.c does not abide to > the current coding style standards, I doubt there is much value in these patches. How do you value the recommended compliance with the current Linux coding style convention? Will my contribution be useful for further considerations? > To be honest I got annoyed after the third patch Thanks for your response. > and stopped reading after the forth. Does anybody in your company care for further improvements also in this software module? Are there still opportunities to continue development in more constructive ways here? Regards, Markus