From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:29:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [v6] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
Message-Id: <31a0ea02-4005-23a4-8030-47319504e84a@web.de>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>, Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> Do you have any other questions?

Obviously, yes.

I am curious if this development discussion and code review will trigger
further software adjustments.
I guess that you will need additional time to reconsider specific items
from recent feedback.

Will corrections become relevant for specifications in (assignment) exclusions
of the second SmPL ellipsis in the discussed script?

Regards,
Markus