From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpupower: Combine two condition checks into one statement in get_cpu_topology()
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:47:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <372aa4f8-7e97-ee83-1078-6f80e28ffdf0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3daea226-c5cb-62e7-a025-8f758712a81a@users.sourceforge.net>
On 11/20/2017 11:19 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:10:14 +0100
>
> The same assignments were used in an if branch of two separate statements.
>
> * Merge their condition checks into a single statement instead.
>
> * Adjust the indentation there.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
> index 9c395ec924de..81c828e5920e 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpupower.c
> @@ -140,18 +140,12 @@ int get_cpu_topology(struct cpupower_topology *cpu_top)
> for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) {
> cpu_top->core_info[cpu].cpu = cpu;
> cpu_top->core_info[cpu].is_online = cpupower_is_cpu_online(cpu);
> - if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
> - cpu,
> - "physical_package_id",
> - &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg)) < 0) {
> - cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
> - cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
> - continue;
> - }
> - if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
> - cpu,
> - "core_id",
> - &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core)) < 0) {
> + if (sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "physical_package_id",
> + &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg))
> + < 0 ||
> + sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "core_id",
> + &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core))
> + < 0) {
This change takes the easily readable code into hard to read code,
even though it removes the duplicate code in the conditional.
Please find a better way to make it not so hard to read.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-20 18:19 [PATCH] cpupower: Combine two condition checks into one statement in get_cpu_topology() SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-21 19:47 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2017-11-21 20:37 ` SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=372aa4f8-7e97-ee83-1078-6f80e28ffdf0@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox