From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 03:28:01 +0000 Subject: Re: ACPI-video: Fine-tuning for several function implementations Message-Id: <3e0cdc5b-fd15-515a-82f2-2f44792664ed@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <897ebf36-2fe5-e109-adf6-b81b6e863d9a@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini > I'd prefer this to be combined into fewer patches > that each will address several issues of one type, I understand your concern a bit in principle. > ie. put all label renames into one patch, Are any of my update suggestions controversial here? > all size determination improvements into another one and so on. I am unsure about the acceptance for the selected software change opportunities. So I chose a very specific patch granularity intentionally. I tend to provide some change ideas for each affected function implementation individually. I imagine that this way should support the recombination of update steps to some degree already, shouldn't it? Regards, Markus