From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:32:31 +0000
Subject: Re: tps65090-charger: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions
Message-Id: <3e6fa357-091c-32bd-7680-bb75084469f5@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <aa138aa9-d8c9-c6e3-7071-9fc642e7b248@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1513450432.4647.47.camel@perches.com>
 <4beb0d2e-adf6-5eeb-43c7-7829d54c6656@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712162135140.17082@hadrien>
 <cf645236-d4da-a52c-216a-248d76a61025@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171218172404.3nqyza4ml5oofykn@earth>
In-Reply-To: <20171218172404.3nqyza4ml5oofykn@earth>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

>> But it seems that we are stuck with specific software aspects.
>> How would you like to see remaining open issues to be resolved
>> there anyhow?
> 
> FYI: I will drop this and (without any further notice) all future
> patches from you, that do no follow the documented process in
> Documentation/process/.

Which details do you find that do not fit to this development specification
so far?

Are there any update suggestions left over which you could eventually accept?

Regards,
Markus