From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:40:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [media] spca500: Use common error handling code in spca500_synch310()
Message-Id: <4921ea61-49cd-4071-e636-c199daddec8e@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <d496ca24-1725-768b-5e55-4e45097cb77d@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709221908230.3170@hadrien>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709221908230.3170@hadrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

>>  	return 0;
>> -error:
>> +
>> +report_failure:
>> +	PERR("Set packet size: set interface error");
>>  	return -EBUSY;
>>  }
> 
> Why change the label name?

I find the suggested variant a bi better.


> They are both equally uninformative.

Which identifier would you find appropriate there?

Regards,
Markus