Re: [PATCH] xen: xenfs: privcmd: check put_user() return code

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

 On 10/28/2010 04:39 AM, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> put_user() may fail.  In this case propagate error code from
> privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch().

Thanks for looking at this.  I'm in two minds about this; the existing
logic is such that these put_users can only fail if something else has
already failed and its returning an error.  I guess it would be useful
to get an EFAULT if you've got a problem writing back the results.

IanC, any opinion?

Thanks,
    J

> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Compile tested.
>
>  drivers/xen/xenfs/privcmd.c |    8 ++------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenfs/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/xenfs/privcmd.c
> index f80be7f..2eb04c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xenfs/privcmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xenfs/privcmd.c
> @@ -266,9 +266,7 @@ static int mmap_return_errors(void *data, void *state)
>  	xen_pfn_t *mfnp = data;
>  	struct mmap_batch_state *st = state;
>  
> -	put_user(*mfnp, st->user++);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return put_user(*mfnp, st->user++);
>  }
>  
>  static struct vm_operations_struct privcmd_vm_ops;
> @@ -323,10 +321,8 @@ static long privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch(void __user *udata)
>  	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  
>  	if (state.err > 0) {
> -		ret = 0;
> -
>  		state.user = m.arr;
> -		traverse_pages(m.num, sizeof(xen_pfn_t),
> +		ret = traverse_pages(m.num, sizeof(xen_pfn_t),
>  			       &pagelist,
>  			       mmap_return_errors, &state);
>  	}