[patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[Dan Carpenter]

We may as well fix this potential leak so we don't have to listen to
the static checkers complain.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
---
Btw.  This function returns -EBUSY on success.  Was that really what
you want?

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
index 432df53..dd861c4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
@@ -445,8 +445,10 @@ static int dwc3_testmode_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	if (!buf0)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	buf1 = kmalloc(BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!buf1)
+	if (!buf1) {
+		kfree(buf0);
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	memset(buf0, 0xaa, BUF_SIZE);
 	memset(buf1, 0x33, BUF_SIZE);

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[Felipe Balbi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:21:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We may as well fix this potential leak so we don't have to listen to
> the static checkers complain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>

applied, thanks

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

* Dan Carpenter | 2011-08-26 12:21:13 [+0300]:

>Btw.  This function returns -EBUSY on success.  Was that really what
>you want?

At that time yes. The idea was to enable the self-test mode of the core
and let it do transfers forth and back and see if it works. There is
also no off switch. I wasn't aware that this piece of code is going to
merged but now I think we need an off switch.
Thanks for spotting this.

Sebastian

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[walter harms]

Am 26.08.2011 12:32, schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior:
> * Dan Carpenter | 2011-08-26 12:21:13 [+0300]:
> 
>> Btw.  This function returns -EBUSY on success.  Was that really what
>> you want?
> 
> At that time yes. The idea was to enable the self-test mode of the core
> and let it do transfers forth and back and see if it works. There is
> also no off switch. I wasn't aware that this piece of code is going to
> merged but now I think we need an off switch.
> Thanks for spotting this.
> 
> Sebastian

I assume that is true for the memset() also ?
so they can be remove safely ?

re,
 wh

Re: [patch] dwc3: add a kfree() on error to dwc3_testmode_open()

[Felipe Balbi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 716 bytes --]

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:32:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Dan Carpenter | 2011-08-26 12:21:13 [+0300]:
> 
> >Btw.  This function returns -EBUSY on success.  Was that really what
> >you want?
> 
> At that time yes. The idea was to enable the self-test mode of the core
> and let it do transfers forth and back and see if it works. There is
> also no off switch. I wasn't aware that this piece of code is going to
> merged but now I think we need an off switch.

yeah, this is rather useful to test the underlying HW. We had the same
feature on MUSB and it helped check if EP0 handling and FIFO access was
working fine.

> Thanks for spotting this.

indeed.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]