From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:34:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm/mach-pxa/stargate2.c: use ARRAY_AND_SIZE consistently
Message-Id: <52073E90.2030008@bfs.de>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1376148353-9699-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <20130810223338.GM5502@mwanda>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308110745030.2072@localhost6.localdomain6>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308110745030.2072@localhost6.localdomain6>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org



Am 11.08.2013 07:48, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> ARRAY_AND_SIZE() macro is horrible, and I would like it if it were
>> removed.  What I meant before was just that probably people will
>> probably complain if we try to remove it.
> 
> Well, I could either wait for someone to defend it, or send a patch 
> getting rid of it and see what happens...  I can't see what could go wrong 
> with
> 
> f(...,
> - ARRAY_AND_SIZE(e)
> + e, ARRAY_SIZE(e)
>   , ...)
> 
> so it should be an easy patch to create.
> 


if it is not to much work, send a patch to get rid of it.
It seems all agree that the disadvantages outweighs it
advantages.

just my 2 cents,
 wh