Re: [patch] staging: comedi: pcl812: missing break statement

Dan Carpenter
2013-08-21T12:49:24Z

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:35:22PM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
>
> (whichever is appropriate)

To me Acked-by is more emphatic. Since you're the maintainer it's
appropriate. I normally use "Reviewed-by" because I don't have the
authority to approve anything. Also if it's a bug fix that I
approve of or if I previously complained about the patch then I'll
use Acked-by.

I don't know how other people do it. :P

regards,
dan carpenter