From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:11:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI: tegra: replace devm_request_and_ioremap by devm_ioremap_resource Message-Id: <521CCF9B.9000004@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: References: <1376911241-27720-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <1376911241-27720-2-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <20130819120249.GA5740@ulmo> <20130819201224.GC5191@mithrandir> <20130827081443.GI8686@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20130827081443.GI8686@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On 08/27/2013 02:14 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:49:07PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Thierry Reding >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:04:24PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Thierry Reding >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bjorn, how do you want to handle patches to the Tegra PCIe >>>>> driver in the future? Do you want me to prepare a branch >>>>> and pull from that or would you rather just take simple >>>>> patches? >>>> >>>> I'm in the habit of applying patches from email, so that's >>>> easy for me. But a branch would be OK, too. >>> >>> Patches work for me too. Is this cleanup patch something that >>> you'd be comfortable with applying after 3.12-rc1 or would you >>> rather defer it to 3.13? >> >> I'm not really sure how we should manage drivers/pci/host/*. >> Those files are mostly arch code, and I'm not sure it's useful >> for me to be in the middle of managing them. >> >> I assume Stephen or somebody has a tree with the pci-tegra.c >> stuff that's in -next right now; it seems like it'd be simplest >> to just add this patch there and merge in during the v3.12 merge >> window. > > If Stephen's fine with it I suppose we could take pci-tegra.c > driver changes through the Tegra tree. But I think it'd be good if > we could still Cc you on patches so you're aware of what we're > doing (that is the same for all drivers drivers/pci/host/*). And > we're going to need your Acked-by on the patches as well. I can push Tegra PCIe patches through the arm-soc tree before 3.12-rc1, but after that point, I think it's best if they go through the PCIe tree, unless there's some cross-subsystem dependency for a specific patch, and with the new PCIe driver, that's less likely.