From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yi Li <lovelylich@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:39:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [Q] Which tree should we work agains?
Message-Id: <539742C9.1080003@gmail.com>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <006601cf8478$52fb3310$f8f19930$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <006601cf8478$52fb3310$f8f19930$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org



于 2014年06月10日 19:16, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:29:55AM +0200, Sima Baymani wrote:
>> The patch you responded to in that link was aimed for staging. Previously,
>> I have understood that staging work is done on staging-next - has this
>> changed?
>
> linux-next is compiled each day from staging-next and 100+ other devel
> trees.  It might be up to 24 hours behind staging-next but it's
> basically the same thing.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
Thanks, Dan. it is very useful!

regards,
Yi