Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

Takashi Iwai
2017-11-28T14:27:51Z

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:19:55 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
> >> in reasonable ways?
> >
> > It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that
> > it worked.
>
> Can this aspect vary over time?

Not really.

> > The test result should be mentioned concisely.
>
> How do you think about to introduce accepted automatic test procedures?

If *you* do introduce automatic testing for *your* patches, then I
appreciate it.

> > You shouldn't rely on my system.
>
> Did this system get sufficient trust so far?

I can trust my system for my purpose.

> > The main point is your patch itself; make your patch more reliable.
>
> It seems that I can make my adjustments only a bit more interesting
> by positive review comments from other contributors
> (if you can not become convinced by the concrete source code changes).

Yes.

Takashi