From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:40:23 +0000 Subject: Re: net-PA Semi: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "pci_dev_put" Message-Id: <547B80B7.5030707@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547A09B1.9090102@users.sourceforge.net> <547B579F.10709@gmx.de> <547B6F9A.8030806@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <547B6F9A.8030806@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lino Sanfilippo Cc: Julia Lawall , Olof Johansson , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > Maybe this topic should be clarified somewhere (e.g. in "CodingStyle")? > On the other hand i always found it obvious that its the callers > responsibility to only pass sane parameters to the called functions... Can you imagine that any more source code places which would benefit from check adjustments because of defensive programming? Regards, Markus