From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:14:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] mpt2sas: issue reset is not uninitialized Message-Id: <547F1AB0.30705@bfs.de> List-Id: References: <20141203100941.GB29583@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20141203100941.GB29583@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Am 03.12.2014 11:09, schrieb Dan Carpenter: > The issue_reset variables were never set to zero. This bug was found > with static analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c > index 58e4521..98bd546 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.c > @@ -3236,7 +3236,7 @@ mpt2sas_base_sas_iounit_control(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, > u16 smid; > u32 ioc_state; > unsigned long timeleft; > - u8 issue_reset; > + bool issue_reset = 0; > int rc; > void *request; > u16 wait_state_count; > @@ -3341,7 +3341,7 @@ mpt2sas_base_scsi_enclosure_processor(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, > u16 smid; > u32 ioc_state; > unsigned long timeleft; > - u8 issue_reset; > + bool issue_reset = 0; > int rc; > void *request; > u16 wait_state_count; hi Dan, just a minor question: did you forget to mention that you also changed from u8 to bool or was this unintentional ? re, wh