From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:51:18 +0000 Subject: Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free" Message-Id: <54D73FA6.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546F16A5.8030405@users.sourceforge.net> <546F2E50.5040804@users.sourceforge.net> <1416593688.6651.39.camel@perches.com> <5471EBAC.40903@users.sourceforge.net> <1416756022.6651.45.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andreas Noever , Joe Perches Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall > Do symbols which are not exported (no EXPORT_SYMBOL_(GPL)) cause conflicts? How do you think about to mark more functions from your software module as static? > I was under the impression that those are module private. > If they are indeed private then I would prefer to not rename them. Would you like to help in avoiding difficulties around name space issues? Will specific prefixes make understanding a bit easier? Regards, Markus