From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:33:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL
Message-Id: <55268DCB.3010201@gmail.com>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1428579988-10167-1-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <1428579988-10167-3-git-send-email-lambert.quentin@gmail.com> <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda>
In-Reply-To: <20150409123633.GN10964@mwanda>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org



On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Oh.  They're not GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend.
The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches 
really are different.
The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second one 
does.
Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ?

regards,
Quentin