From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 10:00:13 +0000 Subject: Re: platform: x86: Deletion of checks before backlight_device_unregister() Message-Id: <558E742D.2010907@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547389A6.9090106@users.sourceforge.net> <3842367.ojrMxTW2rH@path> <5473AD39.9010309@users.sourceforge.net> <20150626230655.GB57818@vmdeb7> In-Reply-To: <20150626230655.GB57818@vmdeb7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Darren Hart Cc: Julia Lawall , Anisse Astier , Corentin Chary , Ike Panhc , Jonathan Woithe , Mattia Dongili , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org > Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch? > I didn't see a reason to prevent it going in. Thanks for your interest around this concrete update suggestion. * Would you like to distinguish the consequences a bit more for results from the application of the semantic patch language? * Where do you prefer to store special extensions for Coccinelle's script collection Regards, Markus