From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:32:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: improve and extend ifnullfree
Message-Id: <562E9BE3.5080004@suse.com>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1445102605-22408-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <56236C9A.8060906@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <56236C9A.8060906@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

Dne 18.10.2015 v 11:55 SF Markus Elfring napsal(a):
>> Remove removal and re-addition of freeing functions.
> 
> I find such a wording confusing for a commit message.

It is also a bit confusing to use the same subject for two patches in a
series. How about

[PATCH 1/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: Adjust tests to compare against NULL
[PATCH 2/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: handle various destroy functions

?

Michal