From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:42:42 +0000
Subject: Re: mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()
Message-Id: <5694E6B2.4070604@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5682957F.5000604@users.sourceforge.net> <20160111080850.GR3331@x1>
 <5694C0AF.2070809@users.sourceforge.net> <20160112091221.GU19803@x1>
 <5694DD6C.7050405@users.sourceforge.net> <20160112111407.GC27358@x1>
In-Reply-To: <20160112111407.GC27358@x1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>

>> Do you request that I should resend my four update suggestions
>> for different components as a single patch series for the software
>> area "drivers/mfd"?
> 
> You have to make that decision yourself.

I chose on 2015-12-29 to send them in the combination you see.


> What I'm saying is, if the cover letter says there are 2 patches

These refer to the component "smsc-ece1099".


> in the set, that's what we should expect.

Can changes for the components "dm355evm_msp" and "twl-core"
be clarified independently?

Regards,
Markus