From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrew F. Davis" Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:57:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] gpio-pisosr: Unlock on error in pisosr_gpio_refresh() Message-Id: <56C78FB3.30806@ti.com> List-Id: References: <20160219215330.GA18915@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20160219215330.GA18915@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter , Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 02/19/2016 03:53 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We should unlock before returning if spi_read() fails. > > Fixes: df6df93c8a73 ('gpio: Add driver for SPI serializers') > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c > index 58ea08df..f9f1074 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c > @@ -53,12 +53,10 @@ static int pisosr_gpio_refresh(struct pisosr_gpio *gpio) > } > > ret = spi_read(gpio->spi, gpio->buffer, gpio->buffer_size); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > > mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock); > > - return 0; > + return ret; > } > > static int pisosr_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, > This must get flagged by some tool, looks like [0] beat you to it. Thanks though, Andrew [0]http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2191913.html