From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chanwoo Choi Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:57:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch v2] PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove incorrect IS_ERR() check Message-Id: <5746D6A8.2030400@samsung.com> List-Id: References: <20160526064541.GA6680@mwanda> <5746AFE3.6030606@samsung.com> <20160526100238.GN11011@mwanda> <5746CCE3.5010701@samsung.com> <20160526105135.GC10957@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20160526105135.GC10957@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Julia Lawall , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 2016년 05월 26일 19:51, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Signed-off-by is like signing a legal document to say that you haven't > stolen any of the code from SCO Unix. Please don't put sign for other > people. You're right. I'm forcing to put the Sign-off. It is just example. But, I still think that patch description including the engineer's name is not appropriate to give the credit someone. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi