From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:33:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch] arm64: KVM: clean up a condition Message-Id: <578794A5.3000701@arm.com> List-Id: References: <20160714101934.GD18175@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20160714101934.GD18175@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter , Christoffer Dall Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 14/07/16 11:19, Dan Carpenter wrote: > My static checker complains that this condition looks like it should be > = instead of =. This isn't a fast path, so we don't need to be fancy. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index a57d650..b0b225c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct sys_reg_params *params) > { > u8 hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu); > - int cp; > + int cp = -1; > > switch(hsr_ec) { > case ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32: > @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > cp = 14; > break; > default: > - WARN_ON((cp = -1)); > + WARN_ON(1); > } > > kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP%d access at: %08lx\n", > Indeed, that looks a bit dodgy. I'll queue it for 4.8. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...