kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: keystone: Fix missing iounmap calls in an error handling path
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 12:14:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58109E32.7080606@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ed7c1abf1666f1e6eda240bb705940bc14bd186.1477339880.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>



Am 25.10.2016 22:35, schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> On 10/25, walter harms wrote:
>> Am 24.10.2016 22:43, schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>>> @@ -220,6 +218,12 @@ static void __init _of_pll_clk_init(struct device_node *node, bool pllctrl)
>>>  
>>>  out:
>>>  	pr_err("%s: error initializing pll %s\n", __func__, node->name);
>>> +	if (pll_data->pllm)
>>> +		iounmap(pll_data->pllm);
>>> +	if (pll_data->pll_ctl0)
>>> +		iounmap(pll_data->pll_ctl0);
>>> +	if (pll_data->pllod)
>>> +		iounmap(pll_data->pllod);
>>>  	kfree(pll_data);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>
>> IMHO calles the iounmap() need no check for NULL.
>>
> 
> ARM doesn't seem to check for NULL there though. So that would be
> a bug.
> 
> It would be nice to remove the checks though. Perhaps someone
> could do that by unifying ionumap into asm-generic with the NULL
> check and then have architecture specific functions for the rest
> of it?
> 

Is there a specific reason not to check ?
It seems not wise to have different behavior across architectures.

re,
 wh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-24 20:43 [PATCH 0/3] clk: keystone: Fix some error handling paths Christophe JAILLET
2016-10-24 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: keystone: Fix an error checking Christophe JAILLET
2016-11-02  0:22   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-11-04  5:43     ` Christophe JAILLET
2016-10-24 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: keystone: Fix some error messages Christophe JAILLET
2016-10-24 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: keystone: Fix missing iounmap calls in an error handling path Christophe JAILLET
2016-10-25  7:08   ` walter harms
2016-10-25 20:35     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26 12:14   ` walter harms [this message]
2016-10-28  0:19   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58109E32.7080606@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).