From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:28:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [0/3] IB-iSER: Adjustments for three function implementations Message-Id: <66bbf52f-c043-e027-277c-8f0195794a4c@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <00e8b16f-c856-8999-fe93-2724a2f6a56e@users.sourceforge.net> <5b2d2862-5694-a10a-be3e-17d2f4687d1e@mellanox.com> <20180128211050.GM23869@ziepe.ca> In-Reply-To: <20180128211050.GM23869-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: Max Gurtovoy , Doug Ledford , Or Gerlitz , Roi Dayan , Sagi Grimberg , LKML , kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > Okay, applied to for-next, thanks both Thanks for your acceptance. How are the chances for integration of further software updates from my selection of change possibilities? Example: IB/iser: Add spaces for better code readability https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/7/667 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9670439/ https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<7e406ba5-f7c8-16a7-9c3e-464e48120088@users.sourceforge.net> Regards, Markus