From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 14:10:22 +0000
Subject: Re: ACPI-video: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
Message-Id: <6882cbb1-3f61-fb64-2972-30c277f28580@users.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <897ebf36-2fe5-e109-adf6-b81b6e863d9a@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAJZ5v0hug9QfZHQosCFFXEcFMsDd=YvXkqMmQya3RSqmOnY4dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3e0cdc5b-fd15-515a-82f2-2f44792664ed@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAJZ5v0gWgxbtJ4m0eDkdOaR_usjTqmcWBWds5qprr+ydHhEjnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gWgxbtJ4m0eDkdOaR_usjTqmcWBWds5qprr+ydHhEjnA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

> Anyway, if there's something I don't like in particular, I'll let you know.

Thanks for your general interest.

I hope that occasional disagreements can be resolved in constructive ways.


> However, it's a pain to review 20 patches if you could review 4 instead.

Are there any more possibilities to improve the convenience for this
change review process with advanced tools?


> Please take the reviewers' time into consideration too.

I am trying this to some degree.

But I guess that it is hard to do something about corresponding efforts
when various contributors can easily spot many software update opportunities
in the discussed source files, isn't it?

Regards,
Markus