From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:14:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
Message-Id: <87d91477-c17c-812d-d3b3-c809b3e68ce8@web.de>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1550217319-40418-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
 <CAK7LNASzd=bL1H34w-E_UD9x6w2=ObyS+EPDZ_jrvfV+ncw-yA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de>
 <CAK7LNASVRbroW9_j1Kda3azHb6PzD3WyVAsKe0HfD1ri0RFPOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903260818460.2463@hadrien>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903260818460.2463@hadrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>, Wen Yang <yellowriver2010@hotmail.com>, Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Cheng Shengyu <cheng.shengyu@zte.com.cn>, Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>

>> So, I just thought v5 was the latest one
>> and I was completely missing the context.
>
> I think it is a minor detail

Additional implementation details were discussed also for this script
of the semantic patch language.


> that will have no impact in practice.

It will take another while to understand the relevance for the circumstances
of corresponding software adjustments better, won't it?

Will mentioned change possibilities be repeated with other update steps?

Regards,
Markus