From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:08:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt_da Message-Id: <87k2e6lqnm.fsf@intel.com> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <3c9785ef-4553-2e3d-2cb2-5cf6d1f31ccd@users.sourceforge.net> <287833f5-f1ad-b7f0-c614-d4c903b1c890@users.sourceforge.net> <87shsulw9k.fsf@intel.com> <20160920104855.GJ13620@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20160920104855.GJ13620@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dan Carpenter Cc: SF Markus Elfring , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Patrik Jakobsson , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Don't be a dummy... This is easy to review an it fixes a bug. > > I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from. > I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has > history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback. But asking > pointless rhetorical questions is not helpful. > > A lot of people are CC'd and you're wasting everyone's time by asking > questions where you know the answer. Fair enough, sorry for the noise. To be honest, I did only look at the patches, not who they were from. We have CI for drm/i915, but I don't think it's constructive to keep changing drivers like this where the upstream isn't actively developed and tested. But I digress. It's up to Patrik anyway. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center