From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:09:01 +0000 Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? Message-Id: List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <02054675-8395-ac81-6863-e3a5cbfc9032@users.sourceforge.net> <7da823eb-939c-9ee6-32bf-db296e6a96f6@users.sourceforge.net> <44fd46f6-441a-d497-9157-7e2a0f3f45da@de.ibm.com> <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Cornelia Huck Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Minfei Huang , Stefan Hajnoczi , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Chao Fan > FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me > offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. How did I "pester" you "offline"? > So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches, Another bit of interesting information, isn't it? > I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see > them unless someone else replies...) I find this reaction strange. - I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it? Regards, Markus