[PATCH] regulator: pca9450: Fix error code in probe()

[PATCH] regulator: pca9450: Fix error code in probe()

[Dan Carpenter]

Return "PTR_ERR(pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio)" instead of "ret".  The "ret"
variable is success at this point.

Fixes: 3ce6f4f943dd ("regulator: pca9450: Fix control register for LDO5")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
index 93154c9c98dd..32780c311ccd 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
@@ -1401,10 +1401,9 @@ static int pca9450_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
 	 * to this signal (if SION bit is set in IOMUX).
 	 */
 	pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(&ldo5->dev, "sd-vsel", GPIOD_IN);
-	if (IS_ERR(pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio)) {
-		dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to get SD_VSEL GPIO\n");
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (IS_ERR(pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio))
+		return dev_err_probe(&i2c->dev, PTR_ERR(pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio),
+				     "Failed to get SD_VSEL GPIO\n");
 
 	pca9450->sd_vsel_fixed_low =
 		of_property_read_bool(ldo5->dev.of_node, "nxp,sd-vsel-fixed-low");
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH] regulator: pca9450: Fix error code in probe()

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:35:24 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Return "PTR_ERR(pca9450->sd_vsel_gpio)" instead of "ret".  The "ret"
> variable is success at this point.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: pca9450: Fix error code in probe()
      commit: 670500b41e543c5cb09eb9f7f0e4e26c5b5fdf7e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark