* Re: exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis [not found] <cover.1772534707.git.p.hahn@avm.de> @ 2026-03-04 8:40 ` Markus Elfring 2026-03-04 15:12 ` Philipp Hahn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-03-04 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philipp Hahn, linux-fsdevel Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo, Yuezhang Mo By the way: It can be helpful to number prefixes according to message subjects in patch series. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v7.0-rc2#n711 > I'm going through our list of issues found by static code analysis using Klocwork. Does this tool point any more implementation details out for further development considerations (with other software components)? Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis 2026-03-04 8:40 ` exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis Markus Elfring @ 2026-03-04 15:12 ` Philipp Hahn 2026-03-05 10:51 ` Markus Elfring 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Philipp Hahn @ 2026-03-04 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-fsdevel, LKML, kernel-janitors, Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo, Yuezhang Mo Hello Markus, Am Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 09:40:37AM +0100 schrieb Markus Elfring: > By the way: > It can be helpful to number prefixes according to message subjects in patch series. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v7.0-rc2#n711 Yes, thank you for the reminder. > > I'm going through our list of issues found by static code analysis using Klocwork. > > Does this tool point any more implementation details out for further development considerations > (with other software components)? This was a run on our internal version of exfat, which matches 'github.com/namjaejeon/linux-exfat-oot/for-kernel-version-from-4.1.0'. Klocwork found no other issues worth fixing in that version. If my time permits I will run it again on latest 'linux-7.0-rc` respective 'master' to see if anything "new" crept in. I'll also report any other findings outside of exfat when I find them. Philipp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis 2026-03-04 15:12 ` Philipp Hahn @ 2026-03-05 10:51 ` Markus Elfring 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-03-05 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philipp Hahn, linux-fsdevel Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo, Yuezhang Mo >>> I'm going through our list of issues found by static code analysis using Klocwork. >> >> Does this tool point any more implementation details out for further development considerations >> (with other software components)? > > This was a run on our internal version of exfat, which matches > 'github.com/namjaejeon/linux-exfat-oot/for-kernel-version-from-4.1.0'. Thanks for such background information. > If my time permits I will run it again on latest 'linux-7.0-rc` > respective 'master' to see if anything "new" crept in. It is probably nicer to repeat source code analyses on more recent software revisions occasionally. > I'll also report any other findings outside of exfat when I find them. I became curious on the aspect on how many development resources you may invest then. Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-05 10:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <cover.1772534707.git.p.hahn@avm.de>
2026-03-04 8:40 ` exfat: Fix 2 issues found by static code analysis Markus Elfring
2026-03-04 15:12 ` Philipp Hahn
2026-03-05 10:51 ` Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox