From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:26:18 +0000
Subject: Re: a dedicated list for build error reports?
Message-Id: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1210221022070.2026@hadrien>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20121018130146.GA11433@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20121018130146.GA11433@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

> However there are other lots of static check warnings that do need
> manual check, which are now reported via private emails to Yuanhan and
> me. If any one is interested in analyzing these possibly false
> warnings and making bug fixing patches out of them, you'll be warmly
> welcomed! :-)

If you could send me any Coccinelle warnings with both the report and the
concerned file, I would be happy to take a look at them, as time permits.

> However it also means you'll not see many of the responses from the
> developers. Since the majority trees are not tied to a mailing list,
> many reports will become private emails if not CC kernel-janitors.

Personally, I am more interested in just being aware of what is going on,
but it is a good point that without a mailing list, there is no record of
the whole exchange, which is probably unfortunate.

julia