From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:19:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1550217319-40418-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Yi Wang , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , Wen Yang , Nicolas Palix , Linux Kernel Mailing List , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Markus Elfring , Cheng Shengyu , Wen Yang On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:19 AM Markus Elfring wr= ote: > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > > > A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script. > > > Sorry for my bad job. > > I usually use LKML patchwork to find patches. > > When I searched "Wen Yang", v6 did not show up for some reasons. > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=3D&submitter"= 638&state=3D*&q=3D&archive=3D&delegate> > So, I just thought v5 was the latest one > and I was completely missing the context. I think it is a minor detail that will have no impact in practice. julia > > > Apology. > > Masahiro > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/com= mit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=DA9cfb87a44da61f2403c431291= 6befcb6b6d7e8 > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/ > > > > > > Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be > > improved further. > > Which changes will get the desired acceptance? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang= 99@zte.com.cn/ > > https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html > > > > Regards, > > Markus > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada >