From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:22:42 +0000 Subject: Re: cris-cryptocop: Apply another recommendation from "checkpatch.pl" Message-Id: List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <0e29d372-ef5f-afa7-50b1-70ddc089ef00@users.sourceforge.net> <130cda68-feed-8b48-e928-7e915888c7c9@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, Adam Buchbinder , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Jesper Nilsson , Jiri Kosina , Mikael Starvik , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org >>> There is plenty of room for at least &(*pj)->iop on the line before. >> >> This is true. - Do you prefer an other indentation approach here? > > Very much. Most of the kernel code puts as much information on a line as > possible, unless there is a reason to do otherwise. Then more of the code > will fit on the screen at one time. How do you think about to clarify such an implementation detail also in a document like "CodingStyle"? Regards, Markus