public inbox for kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Zilin Guan <zilin@seu.edu.cn>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn>,
	Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Paul Ely <paul.ely@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [1/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix memory leak in lpfc_config_port_post()
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 08:28:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8d2af7e-5ddf-4de2-ac1a-8a938280a0f4@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251230062008.1021449-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>

>> See also:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc3#n262
> Regarding the stable kernel rules, do you consider this bug severe enough 
> to warrant a Cc: stable tag?

I suggest to take another look at information from previous discussions on
severity filters.


>                              Since this error path is unlikely to be 
> triggered during normal operation and the leak is small,

It seems that basic data processing was not hindered so far by the affected
function implementation.


>                                                          I didn't think 
> it was critical enough to bother the stable maintainers.

The tag “Fixes” is also an indication for related development considerations,
isn't it?

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-30  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20251229071515.155412-2-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
2025-12-29  9:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix memory leak in lpfc_config_port_post() Markus Elfring
2025-12-30  6:20   ` Zilin Guan
2025-12-30  7:28     ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-12-30  9:05       ` [1/3] " Zilin Guan
2026-01-05  9:53     ` [PATCH 1/3] " Dan Carpenter
2026-01-05 10:17       ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8d2af7e-5ddf-4de2-ac1a-8a938280a0f4@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=justin.tee@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=paul.ely@broadcom.com \
    --cc=zilin@seu.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox