From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 09:30:36 +0000 Subject: Re: mfd: dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child() Message-Id: List-Id: References: <75c1cc23-3a2d-db78-d0f2-b5934b18e828@users.sourceforge.net> <20160628150725.GL24982@dell> <20160628163146.GG29166@dell> <69e96aa0-f3d9-d70d-c3ec-d39b5e9d9f14@users.sourceforge.net> <20160701091732.GK1707@dell> <8c0c2f06-4746-33d4-e40c-987ca3ca51dc@users.sourceforge.net> <20160805075016.GM5243@dell> <59b148eb-6a14-0721-7e4e-60b438fe8ec6@users.sourceforge.net> <20160808091149.GH5243@dell> In-Reply-To: <20160808091149.GH5243@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lee Jones Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall > Please rebase all of your unaccepted patches on v4.8-rc1. Thanks for your suggestion. - Would you like to add any comments to my remaining update suggestions for Linux modules (besides "dm355evm_msp")? I would like to clarify still a few implementation details then. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9210291/ > Also ensure you do not send them attached to any other patch > that you've previously sent. I imagine that another patch can evolve as a reply to a constructive software development discussion, can't it? Regards, Markus