From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:32:28 +0000 Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Message-Id: List-Id: References: <6da7e6dc-b181-d26c-9f09-6592469193be@users.sourceforge.net> <99282c06-bfad-d7cf-16d8-eb1e015ebdbd@users.sourceforge.net> <19724fa4-47eb-827c-cb17-126440500179@users.sourceforge.net> <727d5044-bad0-5170-83c0-dfddcc919588@users.sourceforge.net> <68fd71f5-a3e5-dbb7-d0d9-f9844fabe6c8@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML > So, that's all. Think how the things can be improved in your side, I know a few possibilities here. > not blaming others. But I know also a few other approaches where higher level development tools help to improve the patch review process in significant ways for trusted system environments. Regards, Markus