From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 07:07:33 +0000 Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Move four assignments in bpf_jit_compile() Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20160903.233256.116565014024856604.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julian Calaby Cc: David Miller , sparclinux , Adam Buchbinder , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Rabin Vincent , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kernel-janitors , Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini > In Markus' defence, he does occasionally write okay patches, > (for example the kmalloc(a * b) => kmalloc_array(a, b) changes > get my small tick of approval) Thanks for another bit of acceptance for this kind of software change. > however he also submits a lot of patches which are little more than moving stuff around This is true to some degree. > pointlessly. Do we agree to disagree on the value of some collateral software evolutions I'm proposing for a while? > I really wish he'd concentrate on the former rather than the latter. I am on the way for such a software development adventure. There are further improvement opportunities to consider besides the main route, aren't there? > He's not another Nick Krause. Are you going to remember me under an other nickname anyhow? Regards, Markus