From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:00:43 +0000 Subject: Re: clk/Renesas-MSTP: Rename jump labels in cpg_mstp_attach_dev() Message-Id: List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <1575ddf1-bd1a-fe98-046a-a586eb30fe47@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Laurent Pinchart , Michael Turquette , Simon Horman , Stephen Boyd , Ulf Hansson , LKML , "kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org" , Julia Lawall , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > "Choose label names which say what the goto does or why the goto exists." > > I prefer the "why" over the "what". Does your opinion indicate also that you would appreciate another adjustment around the quoted sentence from "Chapter 7: Centralized exiting of functions" of the document "CodingStyle"? Would you like to achieve that the potential for confusion will be reduced a bit more there? > And the "indent labels with a single space" rule will be removed soon, I am unsure on how this "story" will evolve further. Will the indentation rules become any more precise for Linux source code? > as there's no longer a technical reason for it after > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/7/316 The software update "Set git diff driver for C source code files" is also interesting for current versions. Will language-specific rules which are supported by recent Git software influence any capabilities for the command "diff --show-c-function"? Regards, Markus