Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: indent an if statement

["Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>]

Am 04.11.2017 um 10:16 schrieb walter harms:
>
> Am 04.11.2017 07:12, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
>> The if statement wasn't indented so it makes static analysis tools and
>> probably very recent GCC versions complain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> I went over 80 characters because other lines do already and it seemed
>> like the cleanest thing here.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
>> index d911590d08bc..c83ac4d9ca3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
>> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static void destruct(struct dcn10_resource_pool *pool)
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < pool->base.stream_enc_count; i++) {
>>   		if (pool->base.stream_enc[i] != NULL)
>> -		kfree(DCE110STRENC_FROM_STRENC(pool->base.stream_enc[i]));
>> +			kfree(DCE110STRENC_FROM_STRENC(pool->base.stream_enc[i]));
>>   	}
>>   
> Is that "if (pool->base.stream_enc[i] != NULL)" needed at all ?
> kfree() should happily handle NULL.

Yeah, indeed. The correct solution would be to just drop the "if" as 
well as the "{}".

I would also drop the cast done by DCE110STRENC_FROM_STRENC, cause 
kfree() doesn't care about the type of the pointer.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> re,
>   wh
>
>
>
>>   	for (i = 0; i < pool->base.audio_count; i++) {
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>