From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: nVMX: off by one in vmx_write_pml_buffer()
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:56:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpga86j1ops.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06746553-466d-101f-1bfc-16dc15ec9487@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu, 11 May 2017 09:31:17 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 10/05/2017 22:43, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> There are PML_ENTITY_NUM elements in the pml_address[] array so the >
>> should be >= or we write beyond the end of the array when we do:
>>
>> pml_address[vmcs12->guest_pml_index--] = gpa;
Actually, we can never write beyond the end when we do
pml_address[vmcs12->guest_pml_index--] = gpa (which happens in the
host hypervisor btw). I think this should be changed.
>> This causes a static checker warning but the runtime impact is minimal.
>> The ->guest_pml_index variable can only be set to PML_ENTITY_NUM by a
>> buggy hypervisor.
>
> The v1 commit message is better actually. You can always replace
> "buggy" with "malicious".
I agree, they are interchangeable but what's the worst that can happen ?
L1 killing itself ?
Bandan
> It's a 8 byte write and bits 12-45 of the datum are controlled by the
> attacker. It's pretty bad (and embarrassing - I'm not sure why I was
> super-sure that PML_ENTITY_NUM was 511 rather than 512).
>
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-10 19:43 [PATCH] kvm: nVMX: off by one in vmx_write_pml_buffer() Dan Carpenter
2017-05-10 20:18 ` Bandan Das
2017-05-10 20:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Carpenter
2017-05-11 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11 7:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-05-11 7:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11 13:56 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2017-05-11 15:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11 17:06 ` Bandan Das
2017-05-16 13:56 ` [PATCH] " Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpga86j1ops.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox