From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:38:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3y66ynr5c.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <376869.1852.qm@web113303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (Martin Knoblauch's message of "Thu, 6 Jan 2011 03:55:56 -0800 (PST)")
Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de> writes:
> But who is defining readability? That is not a technical term at all. What I
> view as readable may completely from your or Joes or anybody elses
> opinion.
Readability as perceived by the majority of readers. This is where the
whole community (as opposed to single given individuals) benefits.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-06 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-04 5:59 [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line Dan Carpenter
2011-01-04 6:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-04 9:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2011-01-05 10:24 ` Martin Knoblauch
2011-01-04 16:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-01-04 16:44 ` Samuel Thibault
2011-01-04 17:07 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-05 17:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-01-05 17:45 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-06 12:11 ` Martin Knoblauch
2011-01-06 17:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-06 12:32 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-01-06 17:57 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-06 20:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-01-06 21:02 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-06 21:14 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-01-06 21:38 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-07 17:12 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-01-08 13:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-01-08 17:12 ` Joe Perches
2011-01-06 11:55 ` Martin Knoblauch
2011-01-06 12:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3y66ynr5c.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox