From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:54:07 +0000 Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations Message-Id: List-Id: References: <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net> <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net> <3b7b24bd-4bdf-752e-1a62-cc71e9152acc@users.sourceforge.net> <6da7e6dc-b181-d26c-9f09-6592469193be@users.sourceforge.net> <99282c06-bfad-d7cf-16d8-eb1e015ebdbd@users.sourceforge.net> <19724fa4-47eb-827c-cb17-126440500179@users.sourceforge.net> <727d5044-bad0-5170-83c0-dfddcc919588@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <727d5044-bad0-5170-83c0-dfddcc919588@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Takashi Sakamoto , Arvind Yadav On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:48:52 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Because it turned out that your patch can be wrong and broken. > > At which point did you change you mind for any of my (higher level) patches? Since your patch brought a regression in the past. Takashi