Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

Takashi Iwai
2017-11-28T20:00:34Z

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:57:17 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >> At which point did you change you mind for any of my (higher level) patches?
> >
> > Since your patch brought a regression in the past.
>
> Would you like to discuss the circumstances for the one glitch
> to which you might refer to?

No need for discussion. It's difficult to recover a lost trust.

The best way is to show how you don't fall into the same issue any
longer, and it essentially means the actual testing of the patches.
Now it's clear why the testing is demanded? There is no other way.

Takashi