Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

Takashi Iwai
2017-11-28T13:38:18Z

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device
> >> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)?
> >
> > I don't mind either case as long as the test works.
>
> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
> in reasonable ways?

It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that
it worked. The test result should be mentioned concisely.

> >> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns.
> >
> > It's about your patches, not my system.
>
> Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of
> more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?

You shouldn't rely on my system. The main point is your patch itself;
make your patch more reliable.

Takashi