From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:38:18 +0000
Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
Message-Id: <s5hlgiqr0ad.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <d98a2685-ddf9-1cba-839a-d12c5ff8d3ba@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5hefoy16xg.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <dfa99045-f213-3dad-b1f4-2e90eb38ddbd@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5h7euq9hqt.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <24f8c777-1eb4-e7e7-9371-79f32700c9dc@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5hbmjmluba.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5h4lpelqfm.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5hy3mqr5v9.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <c2b7543c-cd2c-f7f6-98f3-23e2ca6f8b90@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5hshcyr2on.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net>
        <s5hpo82r1s5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100,
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> >> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device
> >> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)?
> > 
> > I don't mind either case as long as the test works.
> 
> How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
> in reasonable ways?

It needs a trust to the patch author or the tester who reported that
it worked.  The test result should be mentioned concisely.

> >> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns.
> > 
> > It's about your patches, not my system.
> 
> Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of
> more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?

You shouldn't rely on my system.  The main point is your patch itself;
make your patch more reliable.


Takashi