From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:11:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1215360718.4197.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=2007; t=1215360721; bh=din352zc+eHK3cEe3hrGMdHsZXaf5dN0bQPUi9023x Q=; l=1383; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f8x8lRvuGoM0Ivsmb+Qbj6poWRAZ/PX3j2vi2 FjEiZjoKJXtTbyQmZwLmuAqGNn4pUEQAwN8eqZKzYbYDo5PTwtg1RrNnRV9X93Tjadt /f+ERd8Oz93ePrCgQjhaeHGa8Hijg/tslLQwSDmT2DdF4UDsgNG4iKXYua3Lc45l+iU = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=2007; t=1215360719; bh=din352zc+eHK3cEe3hrGMdHsZXaf5dN0bQPUi9023x Q=; l=1383; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=koEkD1bEFyjQTYDnmTWxAKwSeCg/fH3p+8mkV oN1Qwq07LjtZoXTlnnpf6aAPN575KYAga/YGRluNtQbCjVa10inGe0IeE9X6ICwCHAD +IsIoapNWAknCPJNDHmlw/g4ApFIKERXrYtk5H5C3nZsomm6BpUNhvBiCVmCinGB7Rs = In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich , Kernel Testers List , Maximilian Engelhardt , Randy Dunlap , "Paul E. McKenney" On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 08:46 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725 > > Subject : USB Mass storage mount fails: Write protect on > > Submitter : Maciej Rutecki > > Date : 2008-05-16 14:55 (52 days old) > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121095168003572&w=4 > > Handled-By : Alan Stern > > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=121433068314568&w=2 > > Hmm. James? Oh ... it was reported against 2.6.26-rc1, so the fix is actually crrently queued for scsi-misc in my internal test rig. However, the reason for the long QA is that there's a potential danger to the fix which is clearing the buffer from the reported length to the actual length will break a SCSI card that misreports the returned length. It seems to be OK on my esoteric SCSI card collection, so I'll push it out to scsi-rc-fixes. However, I think it still wants to run in linux-next for a few days to see if anyone else can turn up a problem. The true issue, of course, is that we won't see a problem until the 2.6.26 release because the hardware that triggers it isn't in the set we're testing with. A less risky fix for 2.6.26-rc9 might be to move the clearing into the affected subsystem (usbstorage). James