From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:57:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1221307061.5213.115.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <48CAE7A0.8000004@linux-foundation.org> <1221306287.5213.111.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1221306287.5213.111.camel-YqMYhexLQo1vAv1Ojkdn7Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 13:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > 2.6.23.17-cfs-v24.1 (identical config) > Throughput 1145.28 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90278.55 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 90579.31 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.01 89412.14 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 90270.97 > > 2.6.24.7 > Throughput 1119.28 MB/sec 4 procs > > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84092.78 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84120.68 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 84076.73 > 16384 87380 1 1 60.00 83995.07 P.S. fwiw, scheduler difference between these two kernels is practically nill.