From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:51:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1221421907.4597.24.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <48CAE7A0.8000004@linux-foundation.org> <1221306287.5213.111.camel@marge.simson.net> <48CD1D25.9080301@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48CD1D25.9080301-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 09:18 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Numbers from my Q6600 Aldi supermarket box (hm, your box is from different shelf) > > > My box is an 8p with recent quad core processors. 8G, 32bit Linux. Don't hold your breath, but after putting my network config of a very severe diet, I'm starting to see something resembling sensible results. -Mike