From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:10:10 +1100 Message-ID: <1234775410.26036.122.camel@pasglop> References: <878wognj00.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <200902142342.59186.rjw@sisk.pl> <87hc2u26m5.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87hc2u26m5.fsf-D7l3p2TGOOdLdt5/z87VRY6ehsQQaF5K@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Paul Collins Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:17 +1300, Paul Collins wrote: > It turns out I didn't test this properly. The warning is only > triggered > when I close and open the lid, not when I run 'snooze' to suspend and > hit Return to resume, as I did for my so-called testing of 2.6.29-rc4. > > Whatever is triggering the warning is still present in 2.6.29-rc5. Right, we probably need to stop sending input events from the PMU driver when it's "suspended". Ping me if I don't produce a patch tomorrow (ie, I forgot :-) Cheers, Ben.